Function is a much harder concept to define than Art, for me. I am not very happy with the term, but I will do my best do clearify what I put into it. Carl Dahlhaus (1970) calls it Genre-music, which in a way perhaps is a better term, but I will stick with Function, since that is the term I have got used to.

Functional music is music that has an ‘outer’ purpose. It may be dancing, it may be a ceremony (like a wedding or a funeral), it may be as a means for friends to hang out together. All this also implies that functional music is music where everyone is somehow participating, there is no real division between performer/creator and audience, everyone is necessary and the one would not exist without the other. Hence functional music depends on (the approval of) the collevtive and doesn’t really give space for the individuality.

Functional music is also music that follows clear and straight lines that are defined by this purpose: If I’m playing for dancing it is the danceability of the music which defines its value; If I’m playing togethere with a group of people it is the musics ability to fit into the taste, style and technical ability of the group that defines its value. This creates a very comfortable space to move within. As long as you’re keeping inside these frames there is a great deal of freedom and it is easy to know what is good and what is not. Quality in this context is about reproducing tradition and convention, fulfilling the requirements of the genre.

Together with Art, Function art can be said to make up a Dichotomy. Or rather: a duality.

11 thoughts on “Function

  1. Pingback: Dichotomy | Folk as Art

  2. Pingback: Function vs. Art – in Context | Folk as Art

  3. Pingback: The world of Swedish folk music – a very short, one sided, and rough description | Folk as Art

  4. Pingback: The Community | Folk as Art

  5. Pingback: Function vs. Art | Folk as Art

  6. Pingback: Art | Folk as Art

  7. Pingback: Body as method | Folk as Art

  8. Pingback: Archaic aesthetics and the concept of Art | Folk as Art

  9. Reblogged this on Global Citizens Art and commented:
    I am reblogging this from Folk as Art because it is very well expressed.
    I like this line, “If I’m playing for dancing it is the danceability of the music which defines its value.” It sets off many questions in my mind about the value of art. Jo

  10. Hi Sven, I have reworked the reblog from your post. I am enjoying your Masters in Nordic Music. We think alike in many ways. But I also find your work challenging, Thanks for the artistic and intellectual stimulation, Jo

  11. Hi Jo,
    I’m glad you enjoying my Masters and really happy that you spread some of it around the globe. And it’s really fascinating to read about the parallels you find to other fields of art.
    All the best, Sven

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s